@madamswer
But what is for sure is that they were duly criticised for it from all quarters at the time, and the criticism is ongoing. I know that PPT gave them hell for it when it was announced, as did a number of their other major institutional investors, and so I like to think that they are duly chastened by the experience, and that similar big ticket deals are verboten.
So, given the ensuing circumstances, in Alesco I see largely a one-off event.
Sure the current board might be gun-shy after the Alesco experience, but being a company run by professionals without any family/founder major shareholder doing a final checks and balances on the conduct of management, there is nothing that can prevent future board from getting infected by the same urge to do more, bigger, fancier, company-transforming acquisitions.
The chairman did touch on the topic of board renewal during the AGM. This process has started in 2016 with the retirement of Gaik Hean Chew, replaced by Graham Liebelt. I expect most of the current members of the board, including the chairman, will retire within 5 years.
Who knows for certain what DLX with a new board will do in the future?
Therefore, I can't be certain that Alesco is definitely a one-off certain.
PS. I’m a bit bemused by your seemingly vehement dislike of DLX management; to the point of precluding you from owning the company (which, as you yourself say, is of such a calibre that it has not skipped a beat despite the strategic blunder that was Alesco). Sure, they might have had a rush of blood to the head four years ago (which saw a serious shareholder expectation exchange ensure), but I think that they – on balance – do add value to the business.
After purchasing Alesco, DLX decides to keep expanding its garage door business. This is something that I don't agree as a potential investor. There is simply zero contribution that the team of 60 or 80 chemists (half with PhD) working in Dulux innovation centre can make to the garage door business.
I have to admit that I dislike companies with a number of unrelated business units, like GUD, MXI, MCP, FBU. And much to my dismay, from my perspective, DLX is trying hard to become one of these companies.
And DLX at current price is not exactly a bargain. For a similar valuation, I would rather buy other companies with more focus, such as REH or BRG.
If DLX's share price stumbles much much more than they did in 2015, then of course I might reconsider buying into DLX and ignore all of these little warts. In the mean time, I am happy to pass.
My portfolio currently has more than enough exposure to Australian housing market through REH & NCK, I don't need to unnecessarily increase it further. Anyway, I learned some time ago that I don't have to own all of the best businesses in the market to have satisfactory result. Most of the dollar gains usually come from 2-3 ideas that have been sufficiently backed.