National Innovation Award for DMTC - ADO, page-73

OK so now I'm too positive on one issue, and too negative on others?

Except that I've said repeatedly that I think this breakthrough on batteries is more likely than not.
But I've never said it's a certainty.

AND in that case yes, we might just end up being a POC company.

I note you ignore diagnostics more widely, because it's been a DUD on that score in terms of business model. Too much emphasis on the science, and not enough on the takeup economics. Where was the planning?

Precisely my point!

But where is the evidence that it's going to be financially viable with POC?
When will we run out of money?
What's their Plan B?
Will it continue to be dilution? Because if there isn't a breakthrough, and POC isn't viable we're heading for oblivion.
There has been a lot of uncontrolled spending in the past from what I can see.
Trips overseas to raise funds...which ended up with nothing.
I want to know what the company is being used for.
The company has been rebirthed before.

I'm not allowed to discuss this?

Put another way, why does the company rely on blind faith so much? Sailing ahead into the future with no business plan? Not one they want to share.

You call it complaining.

I call it critical thinking. Of which there hasn't been enough IMO.

You can try all you like but I will continue to post what I think are realistic concerns.
The Board shows an alarming refusal to be drawn on specifics of POC viability. Laughing in the face of someone who had the temerity to ask for some, is really a worry. As reported in here.

Sorry. It's called a discussion board. Not an agreement board.