National Innovation Award for DMTC - ADO, page-69

Thank you for finally, finally addressing some of the issues I raise.

It's all I ask, really. Address the substance. (meanwhile do try to not insult, or try to not do it quite so much).

I don't think it's a premature concern necessarily. Although I actually signalled it could be myself.

The reason is that we have had far to much in the way of blind faith and not enough in the way of concerns, particularly of a financial nature.

This company has been too freewheeling in the past. On spending. On financial planning. On business plans.

I think there are clues that the Roadshow was intended to lift the SP and it hasn't really managed that because of what you admit.

Not enough detail to interest the market. The lift hasn't been very significant. Not in the context of 28c.

It's been a load of fluff TBH. But then again, I've been told by our formerly erstwhile poster travelbug that I'm not light and fluffy enough for him. Well he's taken his profits and gone. Now he says that ADO is 'too risky' to stay.

Ask yourself why. WHY is it too risky? It's not just me that's saying it. But apparently travelbug is a great guy and I'm an annoyance. OK>