"High costs hurting mine investment, says Gina Reinhart" (The...

  1. 7,501 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 165
    "High costs hurting mine investment, says Gina Reinhart" (The Australian 29th July) is a bit of a laugh
    because Ms Reinhart and her father, Lang Hancock, owes a considerable share to the family's $22.5 billion
    nest egg to West Australian concessions on iron ore royalties from the 1960s to recently.
    It seems that while Ms Reinhart enjoys the benefits of a first world country she wants to reduce the living standards
    of Aussie workers to that of the Third World while supplying China (A Second World Communist Regime) with
    cheap Iron Ore.

    Is $22.5 billion not enough.?

    She is lucky that her operations are not in China or Russia where either the Communist Party or the Russian
    Mafia would relieve her of a few lazy "Billion.

    She is not content with Mr Abbott getting rid of the MRRT which deprives the average taxpayer of a share
    of Iron Ore super profits , but she wants 3rd world wages with 3rd world working conditions .

    Why doesn't she bung her money into Africa where she can get 3rd world conditions which includes a
    tinpot regime that will milk her for what she's got.

    Australia is a package deal as are the regimes of the Third World.
    Cheers
    moorookamick
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.