Again, so sad that you are unable to distinguish between...

  1. 795 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4
    Again, so sad that you are unable to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources of information.

    “The results of this study reveal that inaccuracies exist in public healthmessages, professional communications, and official documentation regarding Hgcontent in at least one childhood vaccine.”

    This in fact does not speak for itself. If this is the most "incriminating" sentence in the study, I daresay it was found that the vaccines tested did not contain mercury, as advertised. A vaccine that purports to contain trace amounts of mercury and in fact contains none, can after all be said to have inaccuracies in official documentation!

    In fact, mercury exposure due to vaccines is insignificant, even for infants with a low body weight relative to the size of the dose. On the other hand how many parents think nothing of exposing their babies to roads, where concentrations of proven carcinogen benzene are far above the WHO limit of zero/nada/zilch? 
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.