mmx quarterly rpt, page-35

I sorry if i,ve missunderstood what happened I may have it wrong , but i understood that it was CHM's funds that got the ball rolling.
What if the directors had used the funds and kept it in CHM hands [Were the directors acting in the best interest of CHM shareholders lending out
chm money to buy an asset for another company they were directors off,They were acting for 2 companies at the same time wern't they? ,apologies if I have this wrong]
Thats how I understand it
The fact that MMX were able to keep it going with further fund s of there own is separate to the first issue , I feel.
Why couldn,t have CHM done the same? they had the money to start with. MMX were broke weren,t they?

I