might as well have left it suspended, page-3

RB,

I don't really shouldn't need to defend myself, so I'll make it brief.

I regularly put links to substantiate my posts.

Enough said.

You made an unsubstantiated claim (amongst others) that the directors were sacked. The CEO said that your claims were garbage. You back tracked on the claim whilst still claiming it true and heading down a semantic path over your own words, asking what others thought was the definition. You deserve an apology for what exactly?

And BTW, you've had a number of posts moderated for being 'unsubstantiated'. RB, if it looks like a turd and smells like a turd, just saying it isn't, without any substantiation??...Well, the evidence suggests it probably still is a turd.

RB, bring on the substantiation. Or show us a post where you gave us substantiated facts.