Regarding allowing certain tenements to elapse begs the question why?
It costs $$$$$ to hold onto tenements,maybe the current board is rationalizing the portfolio of all tenements vended in by the aberdeen crew which maybe a good move.
If Taylor and co have control expect more vending of questionable tenements and dilution of the company.
members statement, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
