Thanks Zmans. I agree that CHM would probably want it to go to...

Thanks Zmans. I agree that CHM would probably want it to go to court. From what I understand...its a pretty strong case. The mis-appropiation of funds is something the law takes seriously and if proved by CHM at court then MMX have some serious concerns.

Settling before this comes out in court and dragging MMX's name through the mud is not in MMX's or their shareholders best interest.

Cranny...in answer to your 12th post stating "Koh and Evans were prepared to accept a few peanuts only 2.8% of the claim"....your beloved MMX directors released an announcement yesterday stating that case will not set a precedent for the CHM versus MMX in September.

I agree 2.8% is peanuts for both who settled in that one...but without it being a precendent...you would probably already realise that CHM probably will not be seeking or settling for 2.8% of their claim against MMX.

This is the unsettling thing for you and its coming out in your obsessive and parrot like argument.

You;re right...no precedent has been set.

The law will sort this one out.

We know which side of the fence you are on. Good luck with it.....but seriously...the broken record thing....its not doing the MMX Hotcopper thread any good.

We are cool, relaxed and know legally...things will sort. We dont really need to fight you on your repeated attempts to undermine CHM....they're well placed in this arguement.