Actually NZ the nay's got much more support and my defense was serially voted down without any care to the substance of my posts.
1/ Do you believe this asset was signed off on under false pretenses, bribe or stupidity?
2/ DD's comments were not fair and balanced so supporting them makes you look unbalanced.
3/ DD's points were illogical at best and at worst well, lets just say the proof is in his history of posting isn't it?
4/ I think people should be judged by their past posts. I tend to ignore Rampers and Naysayers myself and learn to trust certain peoples judgement over time. Like I trust bdabbing over DD, don't you? Like I trust the geologist over DD, don't you?
5/ Don't take my impassioned defense to mean I am unbalanced, illogical or a fool. Just because those reports were posted doesn't mean he was leaving out massive amounts of information.
6/ I have read through his past posts and have formed the opinion that he will regularly flame companies he doesn't own!
If anything people have agreed with DD so to be balanced you should rethink what I have said. I am a long term thinker. I know long term most people will have forgotten the defense and remember the negative. That is why pollies love negative advertising.
I could give you a thousand negatives for ROB, does that mean you should not think for yourself or speak to a professional? Why would both HUN and ROB sign off on this geology? I could post positives from the report but why bother?
If I am the only one who thinks the specious attack on ROB was wrong then aren't you glad NZ that I balanced things for you?
It is not fun to try and bring the logic to the discussion but NZ I have not posted anything I cannot back up with facts, it is not my fault that DD's record stands for everyone to read is it?
Yes if someone flames ROB maliciously I will expose their history of it, ok? IF you read me carefully even though I ask questions that expose the contradictions and fallacies does not mean I character assassinated DD. I predicted in fact he was doing that to himself!
I believe ROB is undervalued by the market and have posted many posts and links recently that many people have appreciated. Go read my posts, perhaps you will see by defending ROB today I actually brought a bit of sanity to an obvious group flaming the company!
I still stand by my opinion that his research was wrong! By saying that I mean no disrespect its just that this is ROB's forum and I can voice my honest opinion even if you think I am wrong, right?
PS - These are only my opinions! DYOR!
Kind Regards
ROB Price at posting:
1.6¢ Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Held