Market Players, page-11

No, What it lacks is high value research from investors to contribute solid information, not key board warrior investor that complain about the share price moment and what people post. The whole idea is to contribute information which high lights the success of Weebit Nano, in providing information about competitors status of R & D, it builds a picture of Weebit standing in the market place, So far I’ve researched half the list I posted above in regards to their R&D status, market status & communization stage and believe me Weebit is looking dam good they are the only company so far to have product package and being provided to non-in-house parties. If Weebit management team had a product that it wasn’t confident with would they lease it to be evaluated by universities and risk their reputation?