"I would have thought the underwriting obligation more binding than the shareholder liability"
mac is a underwriting the first instalment and deutche the second.
apparently deutche bank wants to wind up the company to avoid the underwriting expense
If the company is wound up before the first instalment is due then there is no company left for mac to give money too
doesn't that seem logical?
"I would have thought the underwriting obligation more binding...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
