This is the same sort of information that has been recycled by NTU for over 6 years now yet you only need to look at the SP decline over that period to realize no ones really buying it. Those that did have lost substantial funds investing in NTU.
So whats different now and how is NTU unique when reality is, while 100% Australian owned, the company has majority Chinese SH's, is in severe debt to the Chinese and only has one Chinese offtake partner for production from the R&D pilot plant. Basically its a Chinese company in disguise.
What is the investment case here beyond the HRE hype that keeps getting recycled every once in a while because clearly it hasn't worked for the last 6 years or so?
- Forums
- Commodities
- LYC vs NTU
LYC vs NTU, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
The Watchlist
NRZ
NEURIZER LTD
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online