Let's assume your theory to be correct phish. Don't you think PEN should have explained to all shareholders, both institutional and retail, that they needed to demonstrate alkaline chemistry to be a technical failure before they could move on to the end game, that being acid processing. A strategy that would cost many extra years and many extra millions. You don't think shareholders deserve to be told this strategy? How dumb do you think RCF and Pala would have to be to buy into this strategy?
Come on mate, surely you don't expect anyone to agree with this (except the poor souls who liked your post - 6 and counting. Jesus wept).
Let's assume your theory to be correct phish. Don't you think...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 49 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PEN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.7¢ |
Change
0.002(3.64%) |
Mkt cap ! $274.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 5.7¢ | 5.9¢ | 5.5¢ | $1.879M | 33.05M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 230880 | 5.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8¢ | 277792 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PEN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
