Given that the Eureka Report is only available to subscribers I...

Given that the Eureka Report is only available to subscribers I think they'd take a dim view of me rehashing their articles here for free or listing the other nine companies. But you can register for a free 21-day trial if you really want to check them out. (Yes, I'm a subscriber. No, I don't work for them.)

But speaking very broadly - the article talked about the type of companies that can become ten-baggers and that many were energy companies. And they view Amadeus as undervalued. The emphasis is on "potential" ten-baggers. They're not saying Amadeus, or any of the others, are currently worth 10 times where their share price now sits. Just that they may have the potential to grow by that factor over an indefinite period - could be years.

As an aside - I do quite like the Eureka Report. There's a nice balance of opinions and some very canny operators behind it (Alan Kohler, Gerard Minack, Robert Gottliebsen and The Speculator himself, David Haselhurst). I find articles like the ten-bagger one useful for putting companies on my radar that I might not have heard of or considered. Then, importantly, I do my own research on them before making any decisions about whether they're worth putting some money into. I already held AMU, though.

I have no idea how many subscribers the Eurkea Report has but I believe it is enough to make a decent profit, so as I said it will be interesting to see if this article has any effect on AMU next week, in addition to the existing takeover speculation. It sure beats sitting watching the share price drip downwards from 40c.