I have to say your thoughts on this confuse me - normally, I make sense and respect what you say -
I am sorry - I do not follow here at all -- if I don't get back to you for a while if you reply to this -- I am just a tad busy - so, apologies.
"IMHO we only follow written laws because of our adherence to the important unwritten ones"
that makes ZIP sense to me at all -
I would have thought 'IMHO we only follow written laws because of our NON adherence to the important unwritten ones'
meaning that there's no point in writing laws where they aren't necessary - ie. if people are already adhering to unwritten laws - we wouldn't bother writing them - that makes sense to me anyway
"If someone doesn't take a sick day unless they are sick it is because their conscious does not allow them to do so, they will therefore follow the written law"
You are way off my point --
again - you made a 'blanket statement' about all people --- I gave you an example of where someone WAS sick - not where someone 'wasn't' sick.
Your statement is wrong - it's rather simple - sorry, I do not know where the misunderstand is
