"You do understand on August 1 fork bitcoin forked into two."
As I've previously explained to you, this is both technically and philosophically inaccurate. Bcash hard forked away from the main chain. If I run a node that used the rules prior to this fork, it would run on the Bitcoin network, not on the Bcash network.
"Bitcoin core segwit"
There's no such coin. Bitcoin is the network. Bitcoin core is a development team of a particular node implementation on the network. Segwit fixes a pretty serious malleability security bug.
"bankers supporters"
Since larger blocks cause centralisation (And is a mentally inept way to scale any technology, see TCP/IP), by increasing costs on storage space, network bandwidth and removing smaller miner competition, the "banker supporters" would be more inclined to support Bcash.
Furthermore, Bcash doesn't even need the 8MB for which it claimed was the reason for the fork. Their market is so tiny they don't even need 1MB. They could go down to 500KB and it would still be overkill. You can clearly see this on this chart:
Bcash is just sock puppetry. Their 8MB isn't even 8MB. They designed mining software to limit the block size to create these massive dumps every so often so it superficially justifies their reason for being. But any observation of that above data in the chart reveals that they don't even need 1MB.
