And here we go again…“Since when have any of them backed up...

And here we go again…

“Since when have any of them backed up their assumptions with anything more than just more assumptions?” – Do an advanced search under ‘Amazed’ or ‘Pasboz’ and you will see prime examples of posters who constantly back up their arguments.. As for me, I do my best but do usually have better things to do with my time than engage in discussions like this!

Lots of links have been provided in recent days and in the past, if you have not seen them than that is your problem for not paying attention.

As for Kranky's inferences that I am hypocritical and arrogant re your comment “I think it's funny though that SW has the arrogance to call me out re talking about ECT on the CAG thread and then goes on to do just that.” – I was responding to arguments that YOU initially raised on this forum re the company starting with 'E'. Someone has to correct your nonsense because unfortunately you believe it is your way or the highway when it comes to tech's progressing.

You have indirectly implied that there are many better techs than the one starting with E many times (all people need to do is look at your past posts), so it’s wrong to say you have never disputed Coldry because you have done so many times in many different forms. This is why I don't like how some posters think this is a competition i.e. one tech over another tech, because there genuinely COULD be several successful techs after the govt has learnt through past bad choices/ experiences the consequences of putting "al their eggs in one basket" so to speak. K will not accept any view that is indifferent to your own. A shame really.

I still think a number of techs will be successful not just one (which is why I think the underlying tone in this sort of discussion is unproductive and ridiculous)