LICs, page-32

  1. 4,783 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 148
    Yeah- not sure on that

    This one shows the NTA has underperformed http://www.athelneytrust.co.uk/perch/resources/athperfstatdec16.pdf

    This one shows it has done 153% last 5 years, well exceeding its NTA and the benchmarks
    http://www.theaic.co.uk/companydata/BXBG0/performance

    Ah, 1, 3 & 10 years not good, 5 years good.

    Here are its holdings http://www.theaic.co.uk/companydata/BXBG0/portfolio

    Anyway, its all of 7% of the portfolio, immaterial. I can only assume they want UK exposure, but for 7% not even worth it IMO

    Here we go, website says The assets of the Trust are allocated predominantly to companies with a market capitalisation of less than £300m. http://www.athelneytrust.co.uk/shareholder_information.php

    Also says it is 14% owned by Global Masters, so I think that means its about a $20m company size?? Probably not much liquidity on this I'd doubt

    Probably just cheap UK small cap growth exposure.


    Dunno why they hold Australia in it- but I expect it is because they need dividends to pay the cost of operating the company, or it would always show a paper loss. And Flagship investments has no Management Fee just a performance fee.

    I'd rather a pure play Berkshire Hathaway

    I might get a thread going on that one. Prefer to get a round in instead, but looks like a 3pm shower apparently. If it rains in 2 hours you'll know why
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.