Its not worded very well. I read it as there are now 3. Be they are good at poorly wording announcements to suit them.
The legal team of any parties dont seem to be doing a good job. the 249d was completely disregarded on both accounts when the 1st should gave been enforced. By the 1st group . It doesn't look good for them letting it go.
Its not worded very well. I read it as there are now 3. Be they...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
