11.1g "if adversely decided" was the statement I thought was ambiguous.
a mention of whom this would be adversely decided by would have been a little less ambiguous. Just a loop hole I see.
We are talking a difference of $30million in value. Worth looking at the wording very closer and checking for loopholes imo.
Cheers,
The Sparkler
11.1g "if adversely decided" was the statement I thought was...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
