TRH 0.00% 83.0¢ transit holdings limited

blueballs agreed.However for a true EV I believe it is sensible...

  1. 7,157 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 160
    blueballs agreed.

    However for a true EV I believe it is sensible to include the RAD holding as well and treat it as if it is cash as on any balance sheet it would be considered a liquid asset that can be turned into cash pretty quickly.

    In other words both the cash and RAD shares are elemental value divorced from the potash project.

    If RAD creeps a bit higher I would be all for including the RAD options in the EV calculation as well.

    Hence why your calculations show a higher EV than mine.

    I am not looking for a debate on whether or not RAD should be included in the EV calculations - simply to say at $18mn including RAD or $25mn excluding RAD TRH is still a complete bargain for those whose horizon is longer than tomorrow's market close.

    Let's hope the Greeks play ball in their austerity package parliament vote tomorrow that will help give everything a lift.

    There is a lot of cash sitting on the fence atm looking for a safe(r) harbour - TRH ticks all the boxes imo and as a result should run ahead of the market on a strong green day.

    Be happy

    EB

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add TRH (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.