Kevin Piepgrass - GSM Geoligist & MD, page-56

The real problem is, and your right it is irrelevant about Piepgrass, that posting information on threads that cannot be substantiated may be alright in your world but it isn't in mine.

Regardless of what you think, I am invested in GPP and their 2 projects could be company makers and as such I want the share price to be multiple values of where it is currently, but the market will wait until they see assays results, but in saying that management need to be accountable and transparent to all shareholders and the easiest way to achieve that is via announcements - simple.

You still are missing the whole point of it though, GPP should be using all available resources to increase share holder confidence and share holder value, to which if they can't see that it is teetering down low as in the reflection of the share price then they really do continue to treat their share holders poorly.

GPP has in the past used Borg's name and reputation in announcements and I am just curious, why did you feel the need to post that Borg had brought back in?
Again, its the company that should be promoting and not anonymous posters on an open forum trying to generate interest in a flagging stock.


All IMO only
cheers