I totally agree it is ok to be wrong and the examples you have...

I totally agree it is ok to be wrong and the examples you have just produced (were in the list of announcements in the my previous responding post) doesn't indicate that Piepgrass is overseeing the drilling at Turesi.
GSM have 3 geologists and to date you cannot substantiate that Piepgrass is there with the information released from GPP. Maybe in one of your calls with King it was mentioned, but the point you are still missing, if Piepgrass is there or in fact which ever geologist is there, their commentary on visual inspection of the drill cores would assist GPP's shareholders confidence.

As an aside, even if GPP's future announcements make reference to Piepgrass or the other 2 geologists will not make my debate wrong as one can only use information that is available to them at the time.

All IMO only
Cheers