I beg to differ, as I responded to the post:
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/kevin-piepgrass-gsm-geoligist-md.4167637/page-2?post_id=32816902
Albeit with additional information or in the case of our JV partners, lack of available information.
Ramping?
Whereas in my response I was inferring that a commentary from Piepgrass after a visual inspection of the drill cores
would be in the better interests of GPP's shareholder confidence and possibly the flagging share price.
For example, what would you prefer, a commentary from our JV partner thats on the ground at Turesi (allegedly) and a qualified geologist versus someone sitting at their desk (Watts) ???
cheers