What is so funny Kaunas? Or are you trying to deflect from answering my question?
I merely noted that you used the term indigenous in very odd way. One that stretched the reader's understanding of what it means to be indigenous beyond credibility.
Why do you think I did that?
You seemed to want to conflate and naturalise a meaning for the word indigenous that has never existed and will probably never exist. Why make up a new meaning?
You may not understand what I am conveying to you. That's fine. I'm simply noting that people who use new terms for established meanings tend to muddle their thinking. Which is hardly a matter of amusement, is it?
