No way CTN Board and authorities could just sit there if management of CTN portfolio went back to CGA Given CGA has now ADMITTED it can't deliver a good Micro return for CTN! And No way NAOS ( whichever ? ) purchase can have been based on a non refundable deposit -- Why would NAOS or its funds pay $2m w/o that protection, and run any risk of a new IMA getting rejected. Yet CGA announcement only refers to conditions on the balance of the $6m, and the later year payments - more hot air?
DYOR
No way CTN Board and authorities could just sit there if...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
