And yet you cant even point out a "far more professional, better...

And yet you cant even point out a "far more professional, better researched and a consistent APPLICABLE RELAVANCE evaluation" that has proven to be accurate over the last SIX years. I will even extend that to include any RE junior out there, not just NTU.

What on earth are you talking about now?
The analyst in the reports to which we have been discussing are these analsyts.
The reports to which we are discussing are these reports.
The relevance to which they discuss is relevant as an analysis.

Yet your irrelevance again is in the response speaks in a confused disconnect
. Where are you getting so confused here?


The discussion is about their level of education as professionals analysing a company’s future outcome when operating as a mine. Then you then state that their professionalism isn’t applicable to do so as the share price has dropped in the past.
What on earth has their educated right to offer such a report on forecasted operational figures years(in the future) got to do with the SP fluctuates? You’re making no sense at all again.
How on earth do you invent these ideas to escape my questioning and how much time do you spend thinking weather they are actually logical or not?