Investor Update, page-234

I'm not personally worried about defamation at all if it's a question of law, but this is a question of process.

People are incredibly sensitive in here on anything that could be remotely considered controversial and questioning the prevailing view, and they call in the heavies from the company to remove a statement I personally know to be correct, as false!

Or they make personal insults with impunity. And TU the insults.

This is proudly called 'cleaning up'.

It's a fantastically obvious misuse of the medium. The irony is that they can't cope with the slightest suggestion of anything not being what they want it to look like.

LIke BLIND FREDDY could have seen that this company is in a schemozzle and has been for a considerable time.

But they refuse to have a meaningful review about WHY. We're all told to only look forward.

Shareholders who held LT have been SMASHED.

Traders have had a grip on this. WHO are they? Who knew what and when?

A consolidation is NEUTRAL.

The problem is the DILUTION caused by issue of so many shares, way back when it was supposedly so necessary. IMO it was needed because the company was so badly run.

Who benefits from the share issues? Why is First Cape always hanging around...is it a white knight or more like a vulture?

What are the relationships and dealings between FC and Richard Martin and ADO and why were they necessary?

Why couldn't ADO manage to get a loan through ordinary means?

What was it that the lender Bergen saw, which made them change the loan terms?

These are questions that few, it seems, want answered.

But they're questions that are BASIC about due diligence.

Fanboys? "The mob" is what I call them, but it's the same thing, just more thuggish. Everyone who dispute the prevailing view gets insulted and rated.

Mob rule.

This company has been rebirthed before. WHO will be around to buy up the assets if it happens again?

I've got some ideas about that....