Hi Graymatter,It would certainly be Cranswick because CHM...

Hi Graymatter,

It would certainly be Cranswick because CHM holders would be doing it in their pants......silently pissing themselves at the outcome. (just joking)

On a serious note... (ok after a few beers) I think I have cracked the code,.. very simple really:
(1) An offer has been made to CHM for X ammount.
(2) The offer has been rejected.
(3) The offer forms the basis for further legal action and funding to take it further.
(4) The punters decide to take it to the limit and this explains the "mystery funder" and the terms.
(5) A win is great, CHM wins lotto.
(6) A loss... well further legal appeals are pending......knowing full well that MMX really want to get on with life and will settle for the original ammount offered and that would cover our "mystery funder".

Simple really.

Good luck to you guys.