RB,The reason I keep looking at the past is that there has been...

RB,

The reason I keep looking at the past is that there has been a repeated behaviour and one can only assume, without appropriate answers, that this behaviour will be repeated.

Without clarity, and the Unilab LOI is not past but present and on-going as far as we know, how can we assume, as you do, that it will all be OK?

As Kosenar pointed out, these guys have a 100% success rate on failed deals, for whatever reason. So why will now be different? Gohgate deal stinks to high heaven and I am not happy with the "We'll pay Mt Goh a salary which he'll use to pay off his debt to us, interest free" story. Are you OK with that?

Are you OK with the lack of information on the Unilab LOI? Are you OK with the failure to realise the value on BioInquire? Are you ok with the $6m of loss in the same year as paying big fat bonuses? Are you OK with the failed timelines? Are you OK with us paying 12% while Mr Goh pays us nothing? Sounds to me like you are.