the guys mobile phone has been going to answering service 24/7 since news of his departure broke. clearly he does not want to take calls...
i understand he deserves some privacy but as a crucial founding member of this public company do shareholders not deserve some basic explanation of what is going on? to some degree individuals do/should lose a degree of anonymity when a company becomes public. the board of ddt should realise this.
failure to be clear and concise with shareholders does not send a good message to the market. what/why are they hiding???
in my opinion the silence does not equate to good corporate governance. again, i have always held a high opinion of this company but in recent times they seem to have gone off the rails. i concede they are not alone in this boat (the market is littered with carnage) but hope they can rise to the occasion.
given the multipronged products that ddt possess and jointly own with the csiro there is substance to this company. do they deserve to be trading at 4c or a market cap of $6 million? absolutely staggering to my mind.
DDT Price at posting:
2.7¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
