I can Hear, page-52

Well it would be equally as nice Jase if the case wasn't prosecuted by you on a forum where your clearly are not posting simply in the interests of shareholders rights or knowledge.

You are obligated i believe at least morally to disclose this if it is part of the terms of use of HC- I don't know the rules /laws.

As I said earlier you have an obligation to disclose you are a party to these things not an unbiased observer helping out fellow holders don't you think?

We can all then make a decision of ownership based with this information and likewise we can seek clarification from the Director's who seem to be slated unmercifully with no right of reply- quote whatever precedent of corporations law you like - you'll get your day in Court and both sides get to tell their side.

Do I believe for a moment everything you have posted is a 100% accurate representation of the position with you and the Directors of OZB.... No I don't - I'd certainly like to here from them but equally you should have declared your position not posted based your musings on the 'greater good for all 'when the reality is you are seeking to right a perceived injustice perpetuated against you- ALL POSTERS DESERVED THIS KNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO READING THE OBVIOUS BIAS YOU CONTINUE WITH HERE AND WE CAN JUDGE YOUR ACTIONS AND POSTS ACCORDING TO HOW WE INTERPRET YOUR CLEAR INVOLVEMENT.

Don't you think that is fair Jase or Hoji or whoever we guess you aren't