But apples, if there was an effort somehow by someone to shrink the retail shareholder base, wouldn't the flip side be a concentration of shares in one or two hands, and a requirement to lodge substantial shareholder / change of substantial holding notices?
But apples, if there was an effort somehow by someone to shrink...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
