The thing l like about the ip, is that it seems the US/Aust...

The thing l like about the ip, is that it seems the US/Aust defense guys have tested and certified it for their purposes, which in turn effectively certifies it on a commercial side. The key take away here would be if their was a better 'solution' the defense guys would be using it, yet it seems they prefer the Eos/Lockheed solution, which means it's the best.
I just don't get how Eos could spend $83 mill, and Lockheed agree to spend a similar amour, without some assurity of say a defense or commercial contract, or both. No board would agree to spend such money without some form of assurance, as it's just logical.