The thing l like about the ip, is that it seems the US/Aust defense guys have tested and certified it for their purposes, which in turn effectively certifies it on a commercial side. The key take away here would be if their was a better 'solution' the defense guys would be using it, yet it seems they prefer the Eos/Lockheed solution, which means it's the best.
I just don't get how Eos could spend $83 mill, and Lockheed agree to spend a similar amour, without some assurity of say a defense or commercial contract, or both. No board would agree to spend such money without some form of assurance, as it's just logical.
Horizon, page-9
Add EOS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.28 |
Change
-0.020(1.54%) |
Mkt cap ! $271.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.30 | $1.32 | $1.27 | $1.122M | 873.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1600 | $1.27 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.28 | 7938 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EOS (ASX) Chart |
