I was just saying that the right to appeal is limited to supreme...

I was just saying that the right to appeal is limited to supreme administrative court SAC pending their permit to appeal.

This goes both ways to appeals for or against the permits. Limitation of the appeals is generally not very good thing, but it may have goods sites if the appeals are not good or abused (either for or against the permits).
I think in principle Vaasa administrative court is relatively good court for technical environment issues.
When Dragon fails in Vaasa, this should be seriously considered by the company.

Finnish legal system has problems with some weak or less skillful AVI (permit) and ELY (supervision) authorities.  Dragon has exploited or trusted some of the weakest authorities.

We are looking all the mines in Finland. The mines in north (Oulu and Lappland counties) are permitted by Pohjois-Suomen AVI, which is the most professional permit authority with regard to mines. The permitting process with all documents is much stricter.  If you compare the permit documentations of Sotkamo Silver in Sotkamo to any of  Dragons permits there is substantial difference in amount of details and conditions.  The number of permit pages is 5-10-fold
https://www.avi.fi/documents/10191/...4-16.pdf/52ba2817-db0e-4483-807f-3c2795d52e1c
Moreover the lupa database contains four additional processes to check the 2013 permit. The processes are hanled in about a year, not hang on for many years like in LSSAVI.
https://tietopalvelu.ahtp.fi/Lupa/

However, authorities are given critical responses by environmental organizations about the flaws of Sotkamo Silver permits, too. It is possible that if  comments will not be heard, the new permit of Sotkamo Silver may be appealed.  The quality of the north has been increased since 2014 because of Talvivaara appeals.

The same consultants are doing the permits for different regions, and it could be useful to pay for the work level of the north.

It is expected within 1-2 years that the ELY and AVI authorities would be fused to one national authority, which would reduce the amount of quality difference of the permits. It remains to be seen how professional that authority would be.

It is also possible, that a new mine permit would given without right to start until appeals have been handled. This would happen more likely if the authority is uncertain of the environmental impact.