NB,You seem to have know RB for sometime. You also appear to...

NB,

You seem to have know RB for sometime. You also appear to have a more balanced perspective on NuSep than either him or me.

RB has been telling us for over a year "We're nearly there" and "something big is just around the corner" or "it's only about 2 weeks till we're all rich". He never substantiates any comment, hence many posts are moderated.

His clay and porcelain is an analogy with a false equivalency. Every time these guys emerge from the fire, their Teflon protects them and leaves us burned.

I think RBs current posts have the same validity as his other "comments". The only "fact" he has ever cited with detail was that the independent board was "sacked". He quickly back peddled on that after the then CEO said he was a fool, liar or worse. He even tried to move into a semantic debate about the word "sacked" which he had used?

Predicting 5 announcements means nothing. They could be good, bad or indifferent. He had predicted 2 announcements, one of which was overdue when released. It must have looked good 2 weeks ago, but had to be altered to the bad version because the good version was a pack of untruths and the usual positive spin we're given in announcements.

Championing these guys when 100% of the evidence suggests negatives doesn't fool anyone. To be honest, I wish we had someone on HC who had a positive, fact-based, view which they could substantiate. It might get us to see some positive other than "we've got great IP". Right now, other than that IP which is rotting on the vine, I see nothing positive. And RBs unconvincing posts don't spin me positively, but more convince me that NuSep should be renamed (again) to NuScam.