Well good luck to all EBR holders. Personally, I read the 10 September release which was written by PR consultants. It was however, stated to be a 'plain english' redraft of the 4 September release. The 4 september release seem to report the results of hole TR7 which was positioned to test a target indentified by gravity survey etc. TR7 did not reach the basement target, but intersected very low grade base metals 176-214m downhole. The 10 September report mentions nothing about TR7 but states that they have modelled a target at 150 underground. There is no explicit indication that this target was modelled after the 4 September release (the target for TR7 as I understand it from 4 September was 250m underground).
Grateful if someone could explain this to me.
angus
Well good luck to all EBR holders. Personally, I read the 10...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
