Nasa, we all know that as a passionate MRF shareholder, if you...

Nasa, we all know that as a passionate MRF shareholder, if you knew of end users you'd be sprouting them off on here to support the investment case, like you do with other facts about the company.

It's inexplicable to anyone reading why you would post on all of the angles you do regarding graphene and MRF but when asked a simple question about who is actually paying for it at a commercial level right now, you avoid the question and say DYOR.

The reason ive got annoyed this whole time is because you post dozens and dozens of times about every little fact that supports your case but get defensive and refuse to answer anything that might paint the slightest uncertainty about the company. People can see that a mile away.