Guys, this discussion (by which I mean CST in general, not merely this particular thread) has been more valuable than most, precisely because posters have focused on the topic, and not on each other.
Most of us have made spelling or grammatical errors from time to time. True, in Maria Halasz's case, we can be a little tougher, because the whole thing should have been checked before publishing. My sympathies there lie chiefly with the unfortunate family whose number was given in the report, and who suffered so many unnecessary calls (one of them from me).
But all that is really a distraction from the main issue. Not many of us care how many "i"s should be in Hawaii, or about any other minor typos. We are seriously interested in the premises underlying the report, the logic (or otherwise) of its argument, and the validity of the conclusions.
Please, let's keep the discussion less personal, and more useful.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CST
- hawai
hawai, page-56
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)