The board is saying "we need macquarie so we don't get hammered...

The board is saying "we need macquarie so we don't get hammered by the banks due to loans we have overseas and it would be too risky any other way" but on the other hand saying to share holders "no, we can't show you loan docs or outline specifics of the loans". They are treating shareholders with contempt, but not surprising considering macquarie have been fleecing MAP shareholders blind for years, so why would they want to stop now? We've got everything to gain by sacking macquarie and I hope it happens.