Thanks for your reply. I took the revenue for the six months and doubled it to give a 12 month equivalent. I gather from what you're saying that the revenue was coming in over only three months. This would mean that the revenue should have been multiplied by 4 to give a realistic annual equivalent.
That would make a PE of 15, a much more credible figure.
We need to know exactly when copper production and copper sales first started.
Thanks again. Accounting is a long way out of my comfort zone.
The S/P I used was the price that was on screen at the time. I guess to do the calculation properly we should use the VWAP over the past week and annualized figures derived from the actual period revenue was being generated.
MRX Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Held