gold, page-48758

I'm astonished at how posters on here claim Skol posts little substance.  Of all the posters hen/she more than any posts evidence based posts. 

There have been outlandish predictions about Gold prices that have not come to fruition. Skol points that out.

Total returns on the DJIA have beat gold returns by multiples. Skol points that out.

Skol is clearly not a supporter of gold as a long term investment and clearly doesn't believe in the collapse of fiat to underpin a stratospheric rise.  Nothing on the horizon supports the 'so-called' collpase. Again current evidence suggests Skol is correct to think that way.

Where does this nothing of substance come from?  I'm intrigued!