General Discussion Banter GLN, page-2136

What’s done is done Gassed and if the Asx can’t be bothered getting off their butts to have a look at this then it just confirms their total apathy and toothless ness. As u guys have said they may as well have let it keep trading rather than slapping the speed ticket on it. It was on its way to 100M MC which in my books should be minimum with what they have implied in the upper zone hole 1.

U know, I’m thinking about the GLN silence that we r experiencing atm and would u think they’d TRY and rescue the sp with something bolstering

So why no annmnt on say drilling ahead or we’ve got drilling issues etc etc.

Imo I can’t see any reason to think that perhaps they are getting just what they expected in hole 2.

I have yet to do the research on whether the grabben is controlled by the two NW to SE trending faults and just what Likely timing this occurred. What also interests me is the small vent that is positioned at the lower right of This project right on the fault line. Depending on its age it would more than likely had some depostional influence on the grabben. Havnt looked closely at the CSMAT line that runs into too closely but it appears that the blue zone goes up part of the flank of this feature ???

Another thing that appears to be present is a bit of east/west down dip on the CSMAT similar to the trapdoor hinge on the Galan caldera.

Another thing that’s probably obvious to those like Mattilla that have been in this for a bit is that there are quite a few hot water springs (hydrothermals) within the Galan Caldera that flow into the GLN acreage so these are a potential sweetener for the Li grades as well as the obvious snow melt and ordinary spring water that would emanate from such a large structure as the caldera and that permeate the ignimbrites as per Mattillas theory.

So back to digging re that grabben.

Gr