You guys probably work for company but that's fine I guess.
7.4.2016 First time Tassal mentioned wather impact, one sentence in announcement that they withdraw tender to supply Coles. That was 2 months after highest El Nino impact. (management negate impact even Melbourne university scientist in February said fish is in survival mode. (sourcehttp://iview.abc.net.au/programs/four-corners/NC1604H040S00#playing watch from 9:20 to 10:30)
Dr Tim Dempster said in February 2016, fish was in survival mode, not eating, swimming with opened mouth, highly stressed. Opposite of his findings governemnt allowed new 1,500 tones of fish in Macquaire harbor.
No one find important to say to shareholders that fish not eating and coping to stay alive!
7.4.2016 "This decision was taken to ensure Tassal continues to generate sustainable returns moving
forward in light of warmer water impacting growing conditions for near term supply."
They admit impact 2 months later and withdraw tender to Coles.
If this are not facts, then uprampers facts population growth and demand increasing for salmon is not fact that impact Tassal because enviromental impact ( tonnes of facet laying under cages and ruin ecology chain and increase risk for diseases) and risk is that you will not have what to sell to demand.
This management is shading every information and I don't believe them single thing.
