for the record, page-18

I see the word occasionally, and am familiar with it, so I saw no problem with somebody using it. We are all familiar with different subsets of the entire language, and I think that's a healthy thing.

Getting back off the tangent and to the point though, from my reading in this forum, I believe the post using the word was entirely accurate, agree? At least, I followed the thread at that time and nobody corrected the accusation as far as I saw.

Cheers,
Gatesy
hahaha, long live cutting and pasting,
right?