i've got no idea of the extent but i know they are happening. but my question was more to test whether its ok that not only do the new owners get the business at a bargain price, but former owners and creditors are also made to pick up (at least some) of the restructuring costs. isn't that getting two bites of the cherry? like a lot of other aspects of this debacle it just seems wrong to me.
Financial Commentary - who gives a fig?, page-54
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
