Share
3,028 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 31
clock Created with Sketch.
16/08/16
11:56
Share
Originally posted by Up
↑
Two points which the regulator refuses to consider. It should be illegal for a broking firm to participate in trading. It should be a 'stand-alone' facility. When the likes of bank brokerage firms like Commsec are allowed to trade and broker there is a definite conflict of interest, etc. Although it is meant to be illegal to pre-view orders it would not (given all the past misconducts) that such banking trader/brokers are doing just that, then with the opportunity to X-trade and skip the order queue they can trade to an advantage. Especially if they have prior algorithmic intent to manipulate the price. Two: for too long Commsec has been saying they intend to show Chi-X market information on their site.... but haven't. This means that Commsec clients using their site are not privy to the true market, which facilitates the whole HFT arbitrage, which Commsec participates in.
Snakes are everywhere, and retail mums and dads are prime prey. Hopefully more Canadian like exchanges will start up.
Expand
If there was one thing I would change about the markets it's the conflict of interest presented by advisors being able to trade their own account. Mention this to anybody outside of trading who knows what "conflict of interest" means and they are gobsmacked.
Oh, the stories!
If you have a moment read "Why I Left Goldman Sachs," great book on the machinations.