I respectfully disagree Nano.
IMO I would dismiss it. I've quite often found MS's reports to be questionable or wrong. I personally dont hold them in high regard.
Example: Google - Morgan Stanley Lithium.
There views on Lithium have been wrong and will continue to be wrong as the next 12-24 months unfold. There are plenty of articles challenging MS's report on Lithium.
And they regularly have to admit to being wrong. Few examples:
2018 - Apple, US Bond yields, Lithium
2017 - stated that EV vehicles will takeover (then a yr later claimed lithium going down - doesnt make sense)
- Gave $70m bad tax advice blunder
2016 - Valeant Pharma
2015 - Energy stocks and Tesla
2014 - Qantas
Plus they aren't independent at all. Google: 18-247MR ASIC requires Morgan Stanley
IMHO. DYOR.
I respectfully disagree Nano. IMO I would dismiss it. I've quite...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
32.5¢ |
Change
0.055(20.4%) |
Mkt cap ! $82.30M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 27.5¢ | 33.5¢ | 27.5¢ | $1.328M | 4.323M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4624 | 32.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0¢ | 152597 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PAR (ASX) Chart |
